The ATI Goes After “Smartphones” – I Go After “SmartFarmers”

Is this good news coming from the Agricultural Training Institute (ATI)? “Smartphones, Social Media Become Vital Tools For Farmers Under This Digital Farming Course[1]” (Betheena Unite, 30 July 2021, MB.com.ph):

Farmers Go Digital – A farmer-youth tandem completes the hands-on activity on smartphone familiarization under the Digital Farmers Program (DFP) training conducted by Agricultural Training Institute Region 2. 
(above image from ATI Region 2)

What the ATI is trying is “to build a pool of digitally-adept farmers and agriculturally-involved youth nationwide.” Farmers better at working their smartphones.

The next stage of the ATI training is the DFP to be conducted this August:

The DFP 102 this August will center on in-depth agriculture applications and the utilization of social media and smartphones to improve both farming efficiency and productivity.

After this course, participants should be able to identify and use agri-related applications from both government and private organizations, as well as social media platforms that will enhance their practices.

I can see that all that is for farmers to be good at social media – but not to be good farmers! For the simple reason that social media does not yet present a single Digital Library of Smart Farming.

“Data literacy leads to business results” says the above image quote I found on Facebook (Udemy Business); if that is correct, then it is correct to say, thinking about agriculture, “Science literacy leads to better farming results.”

So we need first to build a science-&-knowledge-filled library of agriculture to help people learn to become better farmers.

Not a single one of the websites of ATI, DA, IRRI, and PhilRice gives you options if you asked for them. For instance, you wanted to plant hybrid rice. Using your smartphone, you type “hybrid rice” (including the double quotes for precision), and none of those websites will show you a list of all hybrid rices available in the Philippines.

I visit the IRRI website (irri.org) and type “hybrid rice,” and it shows me a page with 387 words explaining what “hybrid rice” means, etcetera – nothing else. Still on the website, when I search further for “hybrid rice varieties,” I am shown a countless number of text & image entries but no list of the varieties! Same with the PhilRice website (philrice.gov.ph) and ATI website (ati.da.gov.ph). No list.

All those are old-style websites that keep on adding news & info to the current content but hardly discuss new or improved technology or system in agriculture!

Here are 2 entries in that IRRI webpage:

«Facilitating the development of close partnerships between the public and private sectors to promote hybrid rice research and development

«Carrying out multi-location varietal trials to select the best hybrid rice for different environments.

So, IRRI is still promoting public-private hybrid rice R&D. When will it end?

Instead, IRRI should be promoting the “promising results” of its R&D. That would be a good part of the Digital Library of Smart Farming!

We need a smart library first, and then we can come up with SmartFarmers using their smartphones.@517


[1]https://mb.com.ph/2021/07/30/smartphones-social-media-become-vital-tools-for-farmers-under-this-digital-farming-course/?fbclid=IwAR0IUeVjWXLYpuvhdVBLPkdM8zpZldLn2W1CvV0nKHgRMwPuNkFv3wdrmqw

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more