Communicators For Development, Social Media Should Be At Your Beck & Call!


Of the 5 Os – Obstacles, Opportunities, Options, Outputs and Outcomes – I am talking Options here.

Via email from Academia, I have just downloaded Communication For Development And Social Change, a book edited by Jan Servaes (429 pages). Right under “Introduction,” Mr Servaes quotes Everett Rogers in 1976:

Development Communication is the study of social change brought about by the application of communication research, theory, and technologies to bring about development.... Development is a widely participatory process of social change in a society, intended to bring about both social and material advancement, including greater equality, freedom, and other valued qualities for the majority of people through their gaining greater control over their environment.

Now then, the Mission of DevCom is Social Change, the Vision being Development. Mr Rogers is saying development is “intended to bring about both social and material advancement.” Then, the College of Development Communication, DevCom, of UP Los Baños has not been living up to the mandate of using communication to help bring about advancement of people socially and materially!

Nonetheless, I do not agree with “human rights” and “gender equality.” Village development must be considered above human rights, that is, the ultimate application of the United Nations’ Principle of Sustainability: economic viability, technical feasibility, environmental soundness, and social acceptability.

ComDev or DevCom, we are talking of development of villages. Remember, “It takes a village to nurture a child.” In the Philippines, we are better off than many countries in terms of gender equality, the female here already morerespected than the male, alleluia!

We should now be quite busy with social media for social development. Milena Peisker has the perfect description of what ComDev should be all about in the very title of her 2011 review article, “The Communication of Participation” with the subtitle, “An Exploratory Study Of The Effects Of Social Media On Social Change[1],” and among other things, she concludes: “Social media does not cause social change.” I qualify:

Only society can cause social change, but social media should be able to catalyze social change.

That is what I am after. So, now I’m looking at Facebook and my favorite social media, blog. I use Blogger.com. Facebook and/or Blogger.com, we should all be able to cause society to proceed to change, in this case, in PH Agriculture.

So, currently I have this new blog, I, The Wizard Of Os, where you are reading this 517-word essay (including title). Blogging is where I have persisted, since 2005, in trying “to change the world,” if only the world of thinking.

Which brings me to the “New Thinking for Agriculture” espoused by PH Secretary of Agriculture William Dar/Manong Willie, the thinking encouraged emanating from what Manong Willie calls “The Eight Paradigms,” which are: modernization, industrialization, export promotion, consolidation of farms, infrastructure, higher investments, legislative support, and roadmap development.

Cultivating social change in agriculture via social media is actually Goliath challenges, plural. Are you Davids enough to join? Use your head!

Differently, to encourage you, look at the above image, from Shutterstock.@517





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more