Beyond Survival Into Sustainability Of Farmers’ Rewards – Clustering In Agriculture 2020



Lockdown or not, what is the best strategy for agriculture? For Bangladesh, Shykh Seraj states categorically that “Farming Must Go On As Survival Strategy[1]” (29 May 2020, The Daily Star). Being an agriculturist, to me that is a bad policy – you must look for inspiration out of the desperation. I am Oscar Wilde’s optimist; I am thinking Beyond Survival (image from ISSUU[2]) 

And for my country, the Philippines, I find that encouragement in SEARCA Policy Paper-2 titled “Agricultural Clusters Approach To Enhance Competitiveness Of Smallholder Farms In Southeast Asia” authored by Glenn B Gregorio, Rodolfo V Vicerra, Rico C Ancog, Nikka Marie P Billedo, Rebeka A Paller, Ma Christina G Corales & Imelda L Batangantang (just out, downloadable from SEARCA website).

With SEARCA, I believe that my country should make it a national policy via the Department of Agriculture, DA, under Secretary of Agriculture William Dar/Manong Willie, to adopt the clustering approach in helping bring PH agriculture from Bad to Best!

What is an ideal agricultural cluster? And why is it strategic to define, design and do agricultural clustering in the Philippines, as in the rest of Southeast Asia? The policy paper authors say:

An agricultural cluster – organized either through horizontal (or) vertical linkages, is a strategic approach to operationalize the appropriate channels at a scale necessary for it to have enhanced competitive strength to connect with national and international markets.

In the cluster, we have market connections and value-adding networks that aid the product flow and development. We have an interlocking of 3 linkages. The horizontallinkage is farmer-to-farmer interactions. The vertical linkage comprises the relationships among input suppliers, farmers, common service facility, value-adders, final processors, exporter, and importer. The support linkage includes training, investment subsidies others provided to public, private, and NGO assistance service providers.

And what can we expect from aggie clustering? The policy authors say (my listing):

(1) Improved market awareness & linkages
(2) Access to inputs
(3) Increased production
(4) Minimized risks through farm management
(5) Higher product quality, with improved value chain, value addition
(6) Improved incomes
(7) Improved competitiveness.

The policy paper based those expectations from 3 case studies: in the Philippines on vegetables, Malaysia rice, and Vietnam root crops.

With ACIAR funding, MF Rola-Rubzen, R Murray Prior, P Batt, S Concepcion, RF Lamban, J Axalan, M Montiflor, F Israel, D Apara & R Bacus found in their study on “Vegetable Production In Mindanao, Philippines” that clustering had a positive effect on the volume of production, and increased output value and value of production of 6 commodities (not enumerated). “The study concluded that clustering was indeed effective in elevating the farmers’ household income.”

I have only one comment:

I would have loved it if MF Rola-Rubzen & her ACIAR-funded researchers went on to study that clustering in Mindanao for at least 5 years and recorded that in fact the farmers not only increased their overall incomes but raised the quality of their family lives and, should I say it?

They lived happily ever after!@517





[1]https://www.thedailystar.net/country/news/farming-must-go-survival-strategy-1906141
[2]https://issuu.com/cecanure43537/docs/184935362x-beyond_survival_by_

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more