Wanted: Workshops For Journalists To Understand Technical Language So They Can Write About Science More And Intelligently!


We need Italians to tell us what we Filipinos need!?

Above: A foreign journal has just published the results of a study with Manila respondents, “Challenges Of Communicating Science: Perspectives From The Philippines[1]” (Journal Of Science Communication, vol 19, issue 01, 2020, 21 pages), published by MediaLab of Italy. The authors, Kamila Navarro and Merryn McKinnon, conducted an online survey and semi-structured, investigative interviews, “to examine the challenges faced by local scientists and science communicators when publicly communicating science in the Philippines.”

And there, right at the conceptual stage of the study, lies the problem!

In case you did not notice, I repeat… “scientists and science communicators when publicly communicating science in the Philippines.” Those scientists and communicators are in the academic and research institutions – they are notmedia people. They are communicating hard science – they are not popularizing it!  ( (superimposed image from me)

We need to popularize science.

Since I am both a science writer and science editor, I’m interested in transforming technical language into popular language, so that the layman can understand and maybe apply what scientists have found in studies. This is notthe subject of the study reported, so the results are not relevant to me.

Even the University of the Philippines Los Baños where we find the College of Development Communication, DevCom, has not been conducting studies on how hard science, in the jargon of scientists, can be made attractive reading matter for the general public. I don’t know what DevCom has been doing all these years in terms of communicating science to the people, aside from conducting their own studies.

The researchers say, “Early records of science and technology stories in Philippine print and broadcast media are scarce.” Even now, I can tell you that they are scarce – probably all technical papers published in technical journals are not transformed into popular articles the public can appreciate and apply.

Their (respondents’) answers revealed issues which have been echoed in other international studies. However, challenges of accessibility and local attitudes to science were magnified within the Philippine context.

“Magnified within the Philippine context”? I doubt it. Scientific papers are the same throughout the world – very hard to bite into by ordinary molars (mortals)!

The problem in the Philippines, as well as in other countries,  is that there are no courses or even workshops that help communicators and journalists understand technical language so that they can intelligently write about what they read.

Yes, as the authors observe, PH media maintain science sections like Health or Technology, but these appear only once or twice a week.

Even Agriculture Monthly[2], a dedicated magazine published by Manila Bulletin, does not follow up findings in aggie research to translate into popular language. No, there is no PH publication reporting on the latest science for people to appreciate and apply in their lives.

Hmmm. I can be the one-man band writer, editor & layout artist of a science magazine if anyone has publishing funds. Email me: frankahilario@gmail.com@517

 


[1]https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/19/01/JCOM_1901_2020_A03?fbclid=IwAR07iCsClh1MrtJBhBe83Q7GF5AEq-zO8Kok-6JV8bR2jFMele8MNmFxS3QArticle

[2]https://www.agriculture.com.ph/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more