Hybrid Rice Gives Farmers Higher Gross Income Of P116,000/Ha – Where Is The Problem There?


Above are scenes in the Central Luzon Hybrid Rice Derby Field Day & Farmers’ Forum held 15 October at the Central Luzon State University, CLSU, campus in the Science City of Muñoz in Nueva Ecija (DA Central Luzon Facebook sharing 15 October 2020 by Rica Geda Salas). A total of 7 seed companies participated: Bayer, Bioseed, Corteva Agriscience, LongPing, SeedWorks, SL Agritech and Syngenta:

The activity (aimed) to promote to the rice farmers the various cultural management (designs) and practices and the importance of using hybrid rice seeds in achieving a higher production volume as part of the (DA) Rice Resiliency Project of (the) Plant, Plant, Plant Program.

During the Forum, DA Regional Field Office III Director Crispulo Bautista Jr said that during the dry season, average yields were: inbred rice 5.6 tons/ha, hybrid rice 7.8 tons/ha, a big difference of 2.2 tons.

Now then, are hybrid farmers earning much more to make them happier than inbred farmers? Last year, 40 rice farmers in Butuan City served as cooperators of the DA Caraga Hybrid Rice Model Farm Project (ANN, 07 April 2020, “Hybrid Rice Model Farm Increases Yield Of Butuan Farmers[1],” PIA.gov.ph). Butuan farmer Sammy Barneso said his gross income for inbred was P90,000 and for hybrid P116,000, or a difference P26,000., which he said was “a big help for us.” Ah, dear reader, you must note that that P26,000 is gross, not net.

Now, the production cost is P25,000 for inbred rice and P35,000 for hybrid rice. So, you have a problem there with data reality! (coin-rice-mini-hut image[2] from Dreamstime.com)

So, I am not surprised that “Only A Minority Of Farmers Prefer Hybrid Rice Seed[3]” (28 January 2019, Reicelene Joy N Ignacio, BusinessWorld.com). The factors considered in adoption are:

According to IRRI, in choosing a rice variety, farmers consider grain quality, price at market, optimum yield potential and stability over seasons, maximum tillering capacity for weed competition, resistance or tolerance to major diseases, insects and other stresses, the right growth duration to match the season, and resistance to lodging under normal management.

Our farmers are picky in choosing the rice variety to plant!

That paragraph I quoted above is loaded. “Grain quality” is always a factor in choosing a rice variety – I know because I am a farmer’s son. Farmers plant a new variety with the hope they are going to be the first to taste the sweet fruits of their labor – if that variety tastes that nice, pride in being first!

“Resistance or tolerance to major diseases, insects and other stresses” – Filipino farmers would rather plant and then forget it, except to visit the field on calendared schedule for fertilizing, spraying against pests.

“Resistance to lodging under normal management” – I know that “under normal management” usually means to the Filipino farmer occasional and not regular visits to the ricefield. Ha ha.

Because? The Filipino farmer does not
really take pride in being a farmer.
Because? We have not helped him rise
from poverty to prosperity!@517

 


[1]https://pia.gov.ph/news/articles/1038291

[2]https://www.dreamstime.com/rice-sack-coin-mini-house-isolated-white-background-muslim-concept-zakat-property-income-fitrah-zakat-rice-image182658390

[3]https://www.bworldonline.com/only-a-minority-of-farmers-prefer-hybrid-rice-seed/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more