Here Comes SL Agritech! Advanced In Hybrid Rice, But A Laggard In The Digital World

Now I know why SL-8H, the favorite hybrid rice of mother SL Agritech Corp, is not selling much – because the mother actually stopped openly selling the offspring 7 years ago! Maybe the mother simply forgot about her child?

It’s Christmas Day as I write this; isn’t this child a gift to the world?

Above image: In the Philippines, SL Agritech Corp wasselling the virtues of Super Hybrid Rice on the 11th of April – and then it stopped after that single news item titled “Gov’t Welcomes Super Hybrid Rice[1].” Year missing. You know what? I googled and found that that was 7 years ago yet! 2013. What happened?

Wake up, SL Agritech! Already in 2013, you had good products: SL-12H, SL-8H, and SL-18H. Why did you discontinue your website SL Agritech Corporation at
http://sl-agritech.com/
or simply abandon it?

Me, I believe in inbred rice and hybrid rice. I guess SL Agritech abandoned its digital campaign for hybrid rice because nobody was buying online. I think that is because it did not understand the farmers’ problems with hybrid rice.

It is true, as claimed, that hybrid rice gives higher yields than other rices, especially the varieties planted by farmers. So, why then do farmers not plant hybrid rice?

The usual explanation is that hybrid rice seeds are expensive. Which is correct – but that is beside the point!

The reality with our rice farmers is that they are not entrepreneurial. So? So, if SL Agritech or any other hybrid rice company wants to guarantee strong sales of their hybrid rices, they have to help the farmers in terms of financing, such as:

(a) Consult first with the farmer and make sure he understands the requirements of hybrid rice, such as amount of seeds to sow for transplanting, age of transplants, number of seedlings per hill, distance of planting, and fertilizer(s) to apply and how much.

(b) Loan out the total amount and collect payment only after marketing.

Assistances (a) and (b) guarantee efficient production and a little peace of mind of borrower farmers. However, we have yet to consider the biggest problem of farmers.  

In the 2004 study “Socioeconomic Evaluation of Hybrid Rice Production in the Philippines[2]” in 5 major rice-producing provinces – Davao Del Norte, Davao Del Sur, Iloilo, Isabela, and Nueva Ecija, the group of PhilRice researcher Flordeliza H Bordey found that the net profits from inbred and hybrid rice farming “did not differ significantly,” meaning that the higher risk with hybrid rice was a deterrent to its adoption.

I can explain that. The net profits are comparable even with the higher yield of hybrid rice because those farmers sell to middlemen who dictate the prices. The farmers cannot demand higher prices because the middlemen are their sources of funds for farming. You cannot bite the hand that feeds you!

If we want to help the poor farmers, we have to help them (a) decrease costs of production, and (b) increase consumers who pay guaranteed premium prices – contract consumers.@517


[1]http://sl-agritech.com/myslagri/home/govt-welcomes-super-hybrid-rice

[2]http://agronomyaustraliaproceedings.org/images/sampledata/2004/poster/4/4/723_bordey.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more