The World Press Prize Rappler’s Maria Ressa Should Be Pursuing In Her Journalism


Let me deal with the YES first. Yes, CEO of Rappler Maria Ressa is going to receive a world-class award in a few days, the “UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize for 2021.”

The source of the news is ANN (Author Not Named, “Rappler’s Maria Ressa Gets Prestigious UNESCO Press Freedom Award[1],” Rappler.com). UNESCO made the announcement on Tuesday, 27 April. She will receive the award on Sunday, 02 May – the World Press Freedom Day will be celebrated the day after, Monday, 03 May.

She won the World Press Freedom Prize for her previous & present “unerring fight for freedom of expression,” ANN says. She is “set to receive a prestigious press freedom prize from UNESCO for her fight for free speech in the Philippines, serving as a model for journalists under siege around the world.” The UNESCO prize, worth $25,000, “recognizes outstanding contributions to the defense or promotion of press freedom especially in the face of danger.”

Let me deal with the NO next. No, Maria Ressa is not going to receive the highest award she can get – because she has not set sight on it, and UNESCO has not thought of it. The award? I shall now invent and call it “The Good Press World Freedom Prize.” The prize is $1,000,000 (1 million). The Good Press Prize “recognizes outstanding contributions to the promotion of the public good in the face of hunger.”

On the one hand, the World Press Prize is earned by journalistic exposés – of course, that is accomplished “in the face of danger” because the journalist is digging out political dirt!

On the other hand, the Good Press Prize would be earned only with scientific and technological knowledge & tools exposed by development journalists. Maria Ressa is a journalist digging out the private bad, while what the world needs now are journalists digging out the public good!

In its own website, UNESCO itself says, “Information is a public good.” So why is it not sponsoring a world-wide competition among journalists for bringing out information for the public good and not for bringing out the politicians’ private bad? That is to say, UNESCO is missing its own message, or not listening to it!

I agree. Maria Ressa deserves the World Prize, according to the current yardstick of UNESCO. A brave lady.

If she changes perspective and goes after information as a public good? An intelligent lady.

Since I am an agriculturist, let me concentrate on that. I mean by “public good” any information about the technologies & systems for producing, postharvest handling, processing, storage and marketing of farm produce, that is, crops and animals – as well as fishery products.

Maria Ressa will then be espousing the fight in the Philippines for the public to be informed of discovered knowledge – scientific findings translated into popular language the people can see the need of and understand what they have to do for their own social good – she serving as model for journalists serving the public good around the world!@517


[1]https://www.rappler.com/bulletin-board/maria-ressa-gets-unesco-press-freedom-award-2021?fbclid=IwAR2-BqC8JvIrxBtlBtTe7SxDncc0vXmhdt5bhh35hrma3Qz1ZcqZQiRfBxw

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more