BBM Sir, As Interim Secretary Of Agriculture, You Could Learn From Abroad... President Gotabaya Rajapaksa Of Sri Lanka Miscalculated On His National Policy Of Imposing 100% Organic Agriculture And 0% Chemical Agriculture – Today, Sri Lanka Is A Total Disaster!

Bad news about organic farming? The New York Times said last December: “Sri Lanka’s Plunge Into Organic Farming Brings Disaster” (Aanya Wipulasena & Mujib Mashal, 07 Dec 2021, nytimes.com). National disaster!

Ted Nordhaus & Saloni Shah say, “In Sri Lanka, Organic Farming Went Catastrophically Wrong” (05 March 2022, Foreign Policy, foreignpolicy.com):

Faced with a deepening economic and humanitarian crisis, Sri Lanka called off an ill-conceived national experiment in organic agriculture this winter. Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa promised in his 2019 election campaign to transition the country’s farmers to organic agriculture… Last April, Rajapaksa’s government made good on that promise, imposing a nationwide ban on the importation and use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and ordering the country’s 2 million farmers to go organic.

April 2021, Sri Lankan President Rajapaksa declared the national policy of 0% chemical agriculture (CA) and 100% organic agriculture (OA). 1 year later, there is a national catastrophe!

So, what is the lesson from Sri Lanka?
Sudden Policy = Sudden Death!

Dhinesh Kallungalsays, “Lessons From Sri Lanka On Shift To Organic Farming” (The Hindu,thehindu.com): “… The ill-advised policy of switching to [100%] organic farming, shunning chemical fertilizers, has led to a steep fall in agricultural production and export earnings from tea in Sri Lanka.”

It’s not organic farming – it’s national policy declared without study!
(Milton Friedman quote from Pinterest, pinterest.ph)

Omair Ahmad says, “Sri Lanka’s Problems Are Anything But Organic” (22 April 2022, Science: The Wire, science.thewire.in):

The collapse of Sri Lanka’s economy had little to do with organic farming per se, and much more to do with the disastrous handling of its economy. … The banning of inorganic fertilizers, the reasons… and the way it was done [compose] a cautionary tale of how not to embark on a green transition.

So, BBM Sir, the Sri Lanka tragedy is a lesson from the very top! It is lack of study – be careful to declare any national policy in agriculture just like that!

Notwithstanding the bad news, while I respect current Secretary of Agriculture William Dar’s“Balanced Fertilization” policy for Philippine farms, I am 0% CA and 100% OA – because organic agriculture is designed to solve at least 3 problems nationally:

1.     Food crisis

2.     Farmer poverty

3.     Climate change

(1)   Food crisis – You can grow any food crop using any OA method in any field, includingand especially bad soils, so there should be enough food for everyone.

(2)   Farmer poverty – Costs of OA are very much lower than CA, so returns are very much higher. Also, foods grown with OA are more healthy, and attract more buyers. Healthier foods, healthier returns.

(3)   Climate change – You will help solve climate change with OA because nogreenhouse gases are produced.

BBM Sir! With organic agriculture adopted with cautionary policy nationally, the Philippines will soon be The World Model on the Best Practices in Agriculture!@517

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more