PH Farmers Want Cost Of Fertilizer Way Down – Much Better, Yield & Net Income Way Up!

Facebook sharing today, Thursday, 23 Dec 2021: I see Secretary of Agriculture William Dar acknowledging the multi-faceted problem in the “Hike In Fertilizer Prices:”

The Department of Agriculture, through the Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA), recognizes the ongoing plight of local farmers relative to the hike in fertilizer prices. With increased farm production expenses (vis-à-vis increased fertilizer prices) comes a reduction of profit margins.
Why are the prices of fertilizers increasing?
Can FPA control the prices?
FPA attributes the current price hike to the following: 1) liberalization of fertilizers; 2) the country as a net importer of fertilizers; 3) strengthened global fertilizer demand; 4) increased prices of raw materials, and 5) increase(d) transport and logistical costs.

I say: Sellers of fertilizers care more about their margins than about farmers’ incomes. We all know:

It’s all Economics, Costs & Returns, and nobody can break those Laws. Consequently, the farmers should care more about their farming and decrease their costs much in order to increase their returns much! And they can pick up a few lessons from what Mr Dar is sharing with young agribiz minds.

Here’s a 20 December Facebook sharing of Mr Dar by Noel Ocampo Reyes:

Secretary Dar’s 10 Hot Tips For Young Farmers And Agripreneurs:

1.     Do agribusiness with a heart.

2.     Eyes on the market.

3.     Be infomediaries.

4.     Take to heart the OneDA Reform Agenda as your operations manual.

5.     Go for economies of scale.

6.     Adopt a modern mindset.

7.     Immerse yourselves in the value chain.

8.     Social enterprise is necessary,.

9.     There is money in agriculture.

10. Interact with us boomers.

Let’s take up just #1 – Agribusiness: I say you must be business-hearted. You must be serious in considering reducing the cost of your growing rice: Simply decrease your cost and you simply increase your profit. However, whatever, wherever, whichever, whyever – it’s your choice.

If I were the farmer, my first choice would be not to reduce the fertilizer that I use, amount and/or frequency of applying – but not to use fertilizer at all!

If I were a farmer, my first choice would be what I call now, to be melodramatic about it and memorable, Mulching Matilda. Calling the rotavator “Matilda,” this is what I will cause to happen:

Matilda cuts into the surface of the field shallowly, with all those weeds and crop refuse waiting, so that her rotavator blades cut & mix at the same time soil, weeds & crop refuse – mixing them automatically into a mulch as well as spreading that fresh mulch evenly over the field. Isn’t that wonderful?! Immediately and automatically, that mulch begins to deteriorate as a source of organic fertilizer as well as moisture for the crop.

No fertilizer whatsoever, just the Matilda Mulch! This is my single & complete source of fertilizers, plural, and my irrigation water at the same time. Almost inexhaustible.

If you doubt the scientific value of my Mulching Matilda, I challenge anyone to arrange for a techno demo – your farming alongside my farming!@517

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knorr Of Big Business Unilever Thinks Big Business Regenerative Agriculture – My Tiny Country PH Also Should!

Image
“Knorr’s plan for 50 regenerative agriculture projects is predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and water use by an estimated 30% while improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods.” That is regenerative agriculture (RA) news by Julian Cirineo (05 Nov 2021, “Unilever Wants To Rethink How Farms Work To Secure Food And Resources For The Future,” Rappler , rappler.com ). Note: 50 (not 5 only) RA projects to improve greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and water use by 30% – plus improving biodiversity, soil health and livelihoods. Note the last 7 words in the above paragraph. How can RA improve biodiversity? RA requires that the farmer practices multiculture (a few or many crops grown at the same time in the same place), where monoculture (such as rice-only or corn-only) is the practice – the biodiversity improves crop health because of the ensuing balance of nature, such as some organisms feed on other organisms that would otherwise become pests or cause diseases. RA is your
Read more

In Looking At The Crown Of Thorns, I Found The Clowns

Image
We could use a surprise sense of humor!  Yes, especially on the wide problematic fields of Agriculture. There was this news that some high PH government officials wanted to probe Vice President Leni Robredo for “competing against” PH agencies in providing much-needed assistances during this coronavirus lockdown, and Marigs Laririt shared a picture-story on Facebook quoting Ms Leni as saying, “I didn’t know it was competition. I didn’t see any competitors!” Ms Marigs says, “Ay, parang friends ko kung sumagot si Mam.” (Ay, with Mam, it’s just like my friends answering back.) That is a two-handed backslap, and you can imagine the lady laughing! She is the humor-monger; they are the clowns. Today is Friday, 03 April 2020 and in one account ( Wikipedia ), Friday the 3 rd of April was crucifixion of Jesus and his crowning of thorns [1] . (images: Crown of Thorns [2]  from St Anthony Messenger , 1 st clown [3]  from The Guardian , 2 nd clown [4]  from Shutterstock ) About the living clowns I
Read more

“Natural Farming” – Aggie Journalists, We Must Be Careful With The Terms We Use!

Image
Look at the contrasting images: Which one is correct in claiming what is being practiced is “natural farming”? Top Image: This one accompanies the Anonymous WWF-Philippines story, “Mindanao Farmers Start Off the Year with Natural Farming Systems Technology” published online December 2019 [1] . The World Wide Fund, WWF, is a very credible international source of knowledge on conservation, right? Not this time. Very clearly, you can see the white plastic mulch covering the furrows and bare soil in-between them. Mr or Ms Anonymous, the plastic mulch is not natural. The soil not covered in-between furrows is not natural. So much soil bare, not natural, allowing so much natural water wasted because it had evaporated from the unprotected, hot soil surface! That is not conservation; that is not natural. The term “natural” is used here very carelessly . Aggie journalists, wake up! How come I noticed all that immediately when I saw the photograph? Because I learned my organic farming more t
Read more