Bill Gates & His Meatless Mind Vs Robert Rodale & His Healthy Hope. How We Can Change Climate Change For The Good, Better, Best!
ANN says billionaire Bill Gates believes “All rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef” (Author Not Named, undated, “Reject Bill Gates’ Impossible Burger,” Organic Consumers Association, organicconsumers.org). That’s Gates’ contribution to the re/solution of Climate Change!? His best is not good enough!
Still from ANN:
Bill Gates has
invested in Impossible Foods whose
CEO, Pat Brown, says his
genetically engineered synthetic meat substitutes will replace the use of
animals by 2035.
Hah! It would be impossible to convince me, a Filipino, to
eat synthetic meat – I love the taste of lechon and fried chicken, for
instance.
You’d think the
Impossible Foods pitch would be about the horrors of factory farming. Instead,
Gates and Brown take aim at regenerative organic agriculture and grass-fed
beef. According to Fortune.com: “Gates and Brown believe that genetically
modified seeds and chemical herbicides, in the right doses – and not
land-intensive organic farming – are crucial to curbing carbon emissions.”
(image sources: “Impossible” from Impossible
Foods, impossiblefoods.com;
“Soil pollution” from Pixstory, pixstory.com)
Me: To treat the climate
right, you have to treat the soil right – and thus are able to treat eaters
right!
Rodale Institute
says (undated, “Carbon Sequestration,” rodaleinstitute.org):
If we converted all
global croplands and pastures to regenerative organic agriculture, we could
sequester more than 100% of current annual CO2 emissions.
ANN asks, “Can Regenerative Agriculture replace conventional
farming?” (Author Not Named, 25
Aug 2020, eit Food, eitfood.eu),
and says:
The Rodale Institute
has been running side-by-side field studies for the last 30 years, comparing
organic and conventional agriculture. Results show that after a 1- to 2-year
transition period, when yields tend to decline, there is no difference between
conventional and regenerative farming in terms of yields. In stressful
conditions, particularly during droughts, the regenerative fields perform
better because they are more resilient – the soil can absorb more water because
it contains more biomass. And certainly farmers we work with say the yields are
the same, while their input costs go down.
So,
with 30 years of field studies, Rodale Institute has found that with Regenerative
Agriculture (RA), yields are the same with CA, while costs are lower. And zero
cost to Climate Change!
Organic Consumers
says (undated, “A Climate Solution Is In The Soil,” organicconsumers.org):
With the worsening
crises in public health, biodiversity, and global warming, the future can look
bleak. Fortunately, there’s a solution: regenerative food, farming, and land
use.
Regenerative
Agriculture… has the potential to generate a net decrease in atmospheric
carbon. How? By allowing photosynthesis to do its job. Carbon drawn from the
atmosphere by living plants helps build soil organic matter… Regenerative
farming practices help preserve and build soil organic matter, so the carbon
drawn down through photosynthesis remains sequestered in the soil.
I repeat:
“A Climate Solution Is In The Soil.” This is via RA. Farmers have to be enriching
the organic matter content of their fields – and avoid applying chemicals that generate
greenhouse gases that cause Climate Change – simultaneously enriching themselves!@517
Comments
Post a Comment